The Trade Marks and Designs Registration Office of the European Union
The following judgments in cases involving OHIM at the General Court or European Court of Justice in Luxembourg are available from the Curia website.
T-466/09 Comercial Losan v OHMI - McDonald's International Property (Mc. Baby)
Courtroom II - Level 8 - Community trade mark – Action for annulment brought by the applicant for the figurative mark containing the word element ‘Mc. Baby’, for goods and services in Classes 25, 35 and 39 against decision R 1706/2008-1 of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 1 September 2009, partly dismissing the appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division partly refusing registration of that mark in opposition proceedings brought by the proprietor of the Community word mark ‘McDONALD’S’ and two Community figurative marks containing the word elements ‘McKids’ and ‘McDonald’s’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 25, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 35, 41 and 42.
T-209/10 Deutscher Ring v OHMI (Deutscher Ring Sachversicherungs-AG)
Community trade mark – Annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 March 2010 in Case R 1290/2009-1 dismissing the action against the decision of the Examiner which refused the registration of the word mark ‘Deutscher Ring Sachversicherungs-AG’ for goods in Class 36
T-60/10 Jackson International v OHMI - Royal Shakespeare (ROYAL SHAKESPEARE)
Courtroom V - Base of Tower A - Community trade mark – Action for annulment brought by the proprietor of the Community word mark ‘ROYAL SHAKSPEARE’ for goods and services in Classes 32, 33 and 42 against Decision R 317/2009 1 of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 19 November 2009, which annulled the decision of the Cancellation Division and upheld the application for a declaration of invalidity brought by Royal Shakespeare in respect of that trade mark.
C-402/11 P Jager & Polacek v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 May 2011 in Case T-488/09 Jager & Polacek v OHIM (REDTUBE) dismissing the action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 September 2009 (Case R 442/2009-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Jager & Polacek GmbH and RT Mediasolution s.r.o. – Infringement of Article 80(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Right to an effective remedy
Advocate General : Bot
July 2, 2012