You are here: Home > News Archive > News Item

Coming up this week in Luxembourg

The following judgments in cases involving OHIM at the General Court or European Court of Justice in Luxembourg are available from the Curia website.

Judgments

Wednesday 27/06/2012

T-344/09 Hearst Communications v OHMI - Vida Estética (COSMOBELLEZA)
Community trade mark – Action brought by the proprietor of national and international word and figurative marks and nonregistered marks and trade names containing the word elements ‘COSMOS’ and ‘COSMOPOLITAN’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 25, 28, 35, 38, 39 and 41 against Decision R 770/20072 of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 4 June 2009 dismissing the appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division rejecting the opposition by the applicant against the application for registration of the word mark ‘COSMOBELLEZA’ for goods and services in Classes 35 and 41.

T-523/10 Interkobo v OHMI - XXXLutz Marken (my baby)
Courtroom IV - Level 6 - Community trade mark – Action brought by the proprietor of the national and international word marks ‘MYBABY’ and of the national figurative mark featuring the verbal element ‘mybaby’ for goods in Class 28 seeking annulment of Decision R 88/20094 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 8 September 2010 setting aside the decision of the Opposition Division which had rejected the application for registration of the figurative mark featuring the verbal elements ‘my baby’ for goods in Class 28 in the context of opposition proceedings brought by the applicant

Thursday 28/06/2012

C-306/11 P XXXLutz Marken v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
New Great Courtroom - Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 March 2011 in Case T54/09 XXXLutz Marken v OHIM – Natura Selection (Linea Natura Natur hat immer Stil) dismissing the action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 November 2008 (Case R 1787/2007-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Natura Selection, SL and XXXLutz Marken GmbH – Likelihood of confusion between the figurative signs ‘natura selection’ and ‘Linea Natura Natur hat immer Stil’ – Incorrect assessment of the similarity between those signs – Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009
Advocate General : Trstenjak

T-133/09 I Marchi Italiani and Basile v OHMI - Osra (B. Antonio Basile 1952)
Courtroom II - Level 8 - Community trade mark – Action for annulment brought by the proprietor and partial assignee of the Community figurative mark ‘B Antonio Basile 1952’ for goods in Classes 14, 18 and 25, against Decision R 502/2008-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 January 2009, dismissing the appeal brought against the decision of the Cancellation Division which declared that mark to be valid, following an application for invalidity brought by the proprietor of the national and international word marks ‘BASILE’ for goods in Class 25

T-134/09 Basile and I Marchi Italiani v OHMI - Osra (B. Antonio Basile 1952)
Courtroom II - Level 8 - Community trade mark – Action for annulment brought by the proprietor and partial assignee of the Community figurative mark ‘B Antonio Basile 1952’ for goods in Classes 14, 18 and 25, against Decision R 1436/2007-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 January 2009, dismissing the appeal brought against the decision of the Cancellation Division which declared that mark to be partially invalid, following an application for invalidity brought by the proprietor of the national and international word marks ‘BASILE’ for goods in Class 25.

T-314/10 Constellation Brands v OHMI (COOK'S)
Courtroom II - Level 8 - Marca comunitaria – Anulación de la resolución R 1048/20091 de la Primera Sala de Recurso de la Oficina de Armonización del Mercado Interior (OAMI), de 29 de abril de 2010, por la que se desestima el recurso interpuesto por la titular de la marca denominativa «COOK’S», para productos de la clase 33, contra la resolución del Departamento «Marcas y Registro», que desestima la solicitud de restitutio in integrum y de renovación de la marca, cancelada al expirar el registro

Hearings

Wednesday 27/06/2012

Joined cases T-83/11 T-84/11 Antrax It v OHMI - Heating Company (Radiateurs de chauffage)
Courtroom IV - Level 6 - Community designs – Action brought by the proprietor of Community Design No 000593959-0001 (Radiators for heating) against Decision R 1451/2009-3 of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), upholding the action for a declaration of invalidity brought by The Heating Company BVBA

T-278/10 Wesergold Getränkeindustrie v OHMI - Lidl Stiftung (WESTERN GOLD)
Courtroom III - Level 6 - Community trade mark – Action for annulment brought by the proprietor of the national, international and Community word marks ‘WeserGold’, ‘Wesergold’ and ‘WESERGOLD’ for goods in Classes 29, 31 and 32, against Decision R 770/2009-1 of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 24 March 2010, annulling the Opposition Division’s decision refusing registration of the word mark ‘WESTERN GOLD’ for services in Class 33, in the opposition proceedings brought by the applicant.


 

June 25, 2012